Politik

Open up your eyes.

Thursday, November 17, 2005

Betraying a Minority

The Constitution of the United States of America declares: “…all men are…endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights.” This line has inspired hope to thousands of people in the world looking for a better home. It is a line that promises every man, woman and child liberty. That is what America has come to symbolize—an offer to the entire world to be free. Going back on that promise is treacherous. If America truly abandons gays, I think that we will commit a serious moral crime: betrayal.

That’s why I was shocked when I read the “Gay Rights” editorial in October’s issue of The Blue and Gold. The conclusion to Matt Call’s side reads: “Gays are on their own and will not be supported by the American government.” This seriously offended me. If the freest nation on the planet refuses to help the minorities of mankind—gays included—then who will? The American nation was founded on the promise of equal rights and freedom. To turn our back on minorities such as homosexuals shows a hypocritical example to the world and further diminishes our international pride.

The sentence “Gays are on their own and will not be supported by the American government” displays the same attitude that caused the early Mormon pioneers so much persecution and forced them to find homes in America’s no man’s land, because they were abandoned and unsupported. In the early 1900’s, that attitude was seen in the ill treatment of the Irish immigrants who had to suffer mobs, because they were abandoned and unsupported. In the 1960’s, that attitude was the fuel for discrimination against African Americans—and I don’t think I need to rehearse a history lesson for that example.

This last example comes close to home for me because my father is Haitian and my mother is Puerto Rican. They went through severe social disrespect because they were of different races. To deny gays the right to a civil union and marriage would be like denying whites to marry blacks.

History is trying to teach us something about equality and freedom, and we are ignoring the lesson. I would not have been born if this “[This minority is] on [its] own and will not be supported by the American government” attitude had triumphed. Today, that attitude is trying to attack the rights of homosexuals. We should not let it have yet another chance to cause years of discrimination, persecution, and disrespect, as it has in the past. Let’s remember the important principle that America was built on—the one many of us have memorized since first grade: “…that all men are created equal.”

Can I get a “Hallelujah, amen”?

11 Comments:

  • At 8:00 AM, Blogger Joe said…

    Hallelujah! Amen!

     
  • At 5:01 PM, Blogger Noah said…

    okay well i don't want to sound ummm. . . .anti–freedom. . . .but. . . .the Creator did not give us the right to be gay, He gave us the right to choose to be gay. there's a difference the size of Texas right there.

     
  • At 5:12 PM, Blogger Noah said…

    2 Nephi 15:20-21, 23-24

    I'm pretty glad gays aren't given governmental support. race and sexual preference are totally different positions, and i wouldn't be defending gays if I were you. Note: I do not in any way, shape, or form condone racism or any "-ism" related thereunto. it is wrong and has no bearing on righteousness whether one is native american, african american, white, inuit, chinese or so forth. Homosexuality, on the other hand, has a heavy bearing on righteousness.

     
  • At 8:09 PM, Blogger Alexander said…

    Good points.

    I do want to make it painfully clear that I do not in any way approve or encourage a homosexual lifestyle. I am morally against a homosexual lifestyle/orientation.

    However, I am in strong favor of giving support to gays. The homosexual deserves just as much freedom in this country as does the heterosexual. You should not deny an American citizen rights to life just because they are gay.

    And by the way, this isn't counting adoption. I am very much against gays adopting kids. Ask Amaya if you want a nice story about that...

     
  • At 7:51 PM, Blogger Lindsey said…

    Haha, yes. Our thirty-minute creative writing assignment to write for the newspaper. Haha... What was the title of your article? It was funny...

    My personal opinions are very similar to those of Marcus. I don't think that homosexuals should be allowed marriage, but "civil unions" with certain � but limited � rights should be permitted.

    But, Amicus, we shouldn't get into politics... Although I think this is more about humanity than politics.

     
  • At 5:58 PM, Blogger miss terri said…

    that interesting that you should say that we shouldn't get into politics on this particular blog.

     
  • At 7:50 PM, Blogger Lindsey said…

    No, no, I meant Amicus and me. We are fine as long as we don't get into politics. So, of course we have Government and Citizenship together next semester...

     
  • At 10:07 PM, Blogger Noah said…

    Actually. . . .I think you meant Amicus and I.

    Marcus. I respect your stance on homosexuals being given equal rights. They have equal rights. No one's taking their rights.

     
  • At 10:30 PM, Blogger Lindsey said…

    It is "Amicus and me." Umm, actually, I don't know right now. It depends... Would it be, "I meant I" or "I meant me"? That'll answer it. Gah, I should know...

     
  • At 10:14 PM, Blogger Noah said…

    If you meant to say that Amicus and Amaya are one person/group/affiliation, then I would use "Amicus and I", or "Amicus and myself" but to acknowledge us seperate you would most definitely say "Amicus and me".

     
  • At 12:31 PM, Blogger Lindsey said…

    Well, politically we are definitely separeate. But I think there may be some other rule that supports the other option. But whatever. I don't know. Plus, I'm partially thinking in French right now.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home